Controversy Over 20mph Speed Cameras in Stoke Continues to Grow
The implementation of 20mph average speed cameras in Stoke has sparked a heated debate, with many questioning their effectiveness and fairness. Despite a petition to remove the cameras, they remain operational, issuing thousands of fines and fueling ongoing controversy.
Concerns over the new 20mph speed cameras in Stoke persist, following a Freedom of Information request that revealed a staggering number of fines for speeding on Old Laira Road, which is monitored by average speed cameras. This narrow stretch of road in Plymouth had the highest number of speeding fines in Devon and Cornwall over the past year, as reported by PlymouthLive in December.
The two-way speed camera system was introduced by Plymouth City Council after a 2021 consultation showed that residents preferred average speed enforcement over traditional traffic calming measures. In October 2022, PlymouthLive surveyed local residents on Old Laira Road, and they unanimously supported the new speed enforcement, citing improvements in road safety and a quieter atmosphere.
However, by January 2023, frustrated drivers launched a petition to remove the 20mph speed cameras. The petition's creator argued that the speed limit was unjustified and called for the entire scheme, including the cameras and signage, to be reevaluated. Despite garnering thousands of signatures, the cameras remain operational.
The police's Road Safety Team revealed that, since April 1, 2022, there have been 46,867 notices of intended prosecution for speeding on Old Laira Road. The issue has become contentious for both Plymouth City Council and the police, especially as the council has announced plans to expand the 20mph zone to cover several roads in Stoke.
Commenters have voiced strong opinions on the matter. One commenter, Jannerspanner, noted: “All that has happened is motorists avoid the area and use different roads instead, adding to traffic elsewhere. I would note that cyclists go through Old Laira Road up to 40mph and never get prosecuted, it’s all about cyclists as usual.”
Fudge13 raised concerns about the proximity of the speed limit changes: “If the Stoke scheme is about protecting children, why does it change back from 20mph to 30mph just as you approach Devonport High School for Boys? Surely this is the worst place to increase the speed limit? The first camera should be moved further west and the school included in the 20mph zone. This would not even cost any more money!”
Others, like JanePowell, have questioned the motives behind the cameras: “Where is the evidence this is not a money grab? We need to see how much it has improved road safety and reduced air pollution to justify the costs to motorists.”
A1jackt suggested that some speed cameras are placed for financial reasons: “It is the sneaky speed camera at the end that is making all the money! Strategically placed and just a money-making scam. The average speed cams are fair and work well, but the speed camera catches people coming off a 40mph road and they are not always adjusted. Got me at 23mph!”
The debate continues to divide public opinion, with some arguing that the cameras are crucial for road safety, while others view them as a financial burden. What do you think about the speed cameras? Are they necessary for safety, or just another form of taxation on motorists? Share your thoughts in our comments section.
Comments