Plymouth City Council has introduced a proposal to charge drivers for parking based on their vehicle’s emission levels. However, civic leaders have reassured the public that this initiative is not a ULEZ (Ultra Low Emission Zone) or a congestion charge.

The plan aligns with the council’s goal to achieve net-zero emissions within three years, aiming to encourage residents to adopt more sustainable transport methods. While specific details remain undisclosed, Councillor Tom Briars-Delve (Lab, Stoke), responsible for tackling climate change, provided insights during a recent discussion with the city’s natural infrastructure and growth oversight committee.

Cllr Briars-Delve stated: "We are considering an emissions-based parking charge, but let me be clear—this is not a ULEZ or congestion zone. We are still in the evaluation stage and have not decided on pricing, coverage, or implementation scale. Our goal is to encourage minor behavioral changes rather than impose significant costs on petrol and diesel vehicle owners."

He further reassured the public: "The impact on the local economy is a key factor in our decision-making process. Given the current cost-of-living crisis, we will approach this proposal with caution and thorough analysis."

Public Reactions

The proposal has sparked debate among Plymouth residents, with varying opinions on its potential impact.

One commenter, Tories Out, criticized the council’s management of roadworks, claiming: "The council creates congestion with multiple road closures happening simultaneously. Total incompetence!"

Another resident, Plymothianlad, expressed concerns about the effect on businesses: "Any further increases in parking fees will accelerate the decline of the city center."

Jeanearl voiced skepticism about fairness: "The council wants to ‘encourage’ sustainable transport? The rich will drive EVs, while the poor take the bus. Thanks, Labour."

Other residents suggested alternative approaches. AJGreen argued: "The best solution is to phase out diesel cars first and then gradually replace older petrol vehicles with cleaner alternatives."

Meanwhile, KenJohnson1 warned of unintended economic consequences: "If they implement this scheme, people will avoid the city center altogether and shop at out-of-town retail parks where parking is free. This will lead to more store closures and a further decline of Plymouth’s shopping areas."

Similarly, Triggerandhisdoggo declared: "I just won’t visit the city center anymore."

Some residents remained doubtful about the council’s intentions. Willybizz commented: "They say it’s not a ULEZ, but I don’t trust them. We’ve been misled before."

As discussions continue, Plymouth City Council faces the challenge of balancing environmental goals with economic and social concerns. Whether the proposed emissions-based parking charges will move forward remains to be seen.